Search for: "State v. Lord" Results 441 - 460 of 4,035
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2021, 4:07 pm
B. 1703), and this principle “laid down . . . by Lord Holt” was followed “in many subsequent cases,” Embrey v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
In Trustees of the General Assembly of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic Faith, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am by Katy Sheridan
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 7:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
I do not believe that the standard of care required of a medical practitioner has been more clearly or succinctly stated than by Lord Hewart C.J. in Rex v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Referring to the use of the power to order publications of a summary of court judgments in s.12 of the Defamation Act 2013, and comments made on this by Mr Justice Nicklin in a 2018 case, Lord Justice Warby states [55]: ….Counsel [Mr Speck] went so far as to suggest in writing that in this case this remedy is ‘intended more as a species of punishment and retribution rather than a necessary and proportionate measure in the interests of the claimant or the public’.… [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:57 am by Stephen Sachs
In the Supreme Court's recent standing decision, Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 12:58 pm by skelly
Locke Lord’s Privacy & Cybersecurity Newsletter provides topical snapshots of recent developments in the fast-changing world of privacy, data protection, and cyber risk management. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:26 am by Chukwuma Okoli
All suits and actions arising under this Agreement shall be brought in the Commonwealth of Virginia, USA and License hereby submits to the jurisdiction of the Courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the United States District Courts Sitting in Virginia. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 1:02 pm by INFORRM
‘The defendant’s submission on this point does not seem to me to belong to the real world of this litigation,’ it states. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am by CMS
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:34 am by Ben Millson (Bristows)
  The appeal also featured an intervention from the Secretary of State for Defence, who argued that the authorisation should be option (1). [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Reed identifies four principal errors in the judgment of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:46 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Briggs and Lord Hamblen gave the judgment, with which the other members of the Court agreed. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am by CMS
The Defendants relied on an early 20th Century authority of Channell J in Gelmini v Moriggia [1913] 2 KB 549, where it was clearly stated that: “…in all cases of contract the person who has to pay has the whole of the day upon which payment is due in which to pay; therefore until the expiration of that day an action cannot be brought because until then there is no complete cause of action. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
On 11 February Lord Justice Warby handed down judgment on the summary judgment application in the case of HRH Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch). [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:03 am by SW
The legislation should not be interpreted mechanistically, Lord Brightman in Re Betts (1983) 2 AC 613 stated that “just legislation” must mean local connection is established “in real terms” and an applicant needs to show enduring ties to an area. [read post]