Search for: "State v. Maxwell"
Results 441 - 460
of 480
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2011, 11:52 am
United States, No. 10-587C (March 29, 2011). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:55 pm
Sweet & Maxwell, Lord on Chapter 7, p. 272) [ix] Justice R.V. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Secondly, it claims, in effect, that the Master of the Rolls’ private researches demonstrates the law, as stated in the leading text book, to be not only wrong but unarguable. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
According to the publisher's (Sweet & Maxwell -- or is it Thomson -- or is it Reuters?) [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
On the subject of ethics, there's good news for practitioners of espionage -- if they happen to be in the United States, that is. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:07 am
In line with the above-stated quotation, they suggest a radical reorientation of choice-of-law rules. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
In other words: evidence of lies in the proceedings, a costs order must be made.Justice Boland stated the approach to be taken on costs:The relevant provisions of the Act are s 117, s 117AB and s 117C. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm
Ante Gotovina was quoted in the following article: Mark “Max” Maxwell & Richard V. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:26 pm
Specifically, Mr Shao knew of increased costs, additional equipment lease expenses, delays in receiving payments from Chinese state-owned customers and increased costs of approximately A$1 million in preparing for the IPO. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
If the distinction in cl.4(2) were not drawn in the way that it is, it could in principle entail an enhanced personal right to access information including governmental information (see in this context the discussion in Kennedy v Information Commissioner [2015] AC 455 (SC)). [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm
The Supreme Court has gone back and forth on whether unanimity is required for a verdict of guilt, compare Maxwell v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:28 pm
This broad issue came before the United States Supreme Court in McKune v Lile, 536 US 24 (2002), which also involved the consequences of a sex offender not confessing guilt. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Aereo The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 11:43 am
Onions were distributed to wholesalers, restaurants, and retail stores in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:25 pm
Professor Liu: "Taiwan and China developed differently; in Taiwan the state has become a neutral arbitrator for business, not a player in the economy as is the case in China. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
V .R. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
” United States v. [read post]
