Search for: "State v. Michael A."
Results 441 - 460
of 13,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2023, 2:41 pm
The case Meghan Christmas v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
Paul Lombardo, Georgia State University, on Buck v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 4:44 am
In Carpenter v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
State Farm Insurance v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Plaintiffs-Appellants in this appeal to the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, are fifty former field employees of defendants "Michael Bloomberg and Mike Bloomberg 2020, Inc. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Plaintiffs-Appellants in this appeal to the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, are fifty former field employees of defendants "Michael Bloomberg and Mike Bloomberg 2020, Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm
One of the earliest examples is Hahn v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am
Respected conservative former federal appeals court judge Michael Luttig had also made that point to Mike Pence just before January 6, 2021.(4) The factual predicate for the plot that Eastman (and Chesebro) hatched was that state and federal courts had ordered or allowed departures from the letter of state election law--and that these allowances deprived state legislatures of their constitutiona [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm
Attorney General Michael Mukasey's op-ed "Was Trump 'an Officer of the United States'? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:57 am
Facts: This case (Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 5:33 am
Meanwhile, the rhetoric now features an attempt to re-interpret the Supreme Court’s 2021 Access Copyright v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
The substantive law of the State of Florida shall govern this Agreement. [read post]
