Search for: "State v. Minn"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2016, 10:00 am
Headnotes 103 (2016): October Term 2014 featured what is to date the most important state and local tax case since 1992’s Quill Corp. v. [read post]
Minnesota addresses architectural barriers to public places: 2016 amendments to its Human Rights Act
20 Jun 2016, 10:17 am
Disability Support Alliance v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
An infantile child prank becomes a felony charge for the perpetrator.Last year, Justice Scalia noted in in his partial concurrence in Kansas v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
The dissent would allow Congress to play favorites among the states in the guise of dealing with low minority turnout.National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:37 am
Lumpkin On May 31, 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:37 am
Lumpkin On May 31, 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:37 am
Lumpkin On May 31, 2016, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:48 am
Minn. 1991) where the plaintiff successfully claimed for use of his character name ‘Spanky’.The potential for a broad interpretation of ‘identity’ is best illustrated by the Californian case of White v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 9:01 pm
”Morrissey v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:27 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm
Minn. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
For other Texas (and other states’) cases applying the learned intermediary rule to prescription medical devices, see our post here.Collectively, strike one.Second, Texas’ rejection of design defect claims involving prescription medical products is also reflected in that state’s product liability statute. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 8:00 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
A plaintiff whose PII, PFI, or PPI was stolen by hackers typically brings suit against the hacked company on his or her own behalf and on behalf of a class of similarly situated people, hoping the presiding court will certify the proposed class and allow the case to proceed as a class action.[3] Causes of action in customer cases run a wide gamut of legal theories, from traditional tort claims (negligence and fraud) to allegations of state and federal statutory violations (for… [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 12:23 pm
Minn. case that in turn quotes Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:28 pm
Minn.). [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
