Search for: "State v. National Advertising Co." Results 441 - 460 of 772
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
His co-Defendants are the “Gay Zombies,” who have the pseudonyms, Adam Zombie, Brian Zombie, Christopher Zombie, Douglas Zombie, Edward Zombie, and Frank Zombie, along with the unidentified financial backers. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica)   Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP)   Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:30 am by Kelly
United States (Patently-O) CAFC finds claim construction arguments waived on appeal: Enovsys LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Beginning in the late 1970s, courts established themselves as aggressive co-regulators in this area through their administration of civil actions in negligence. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Reagan National Advertising (2022)] rejected a per se rule "that a regulation cannot be content neutral if it requires reading the [speech] at issue. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
A complaint against the Enfield Gazette and Advertiser by road safety campaigner Paul Mandel was dismissed by IPSO (01071-17 Mandel v Enfield Gazette & Advertiser). [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 10:49 am by Jay Stanley
In this respect, Baltimore’s plan echoes the National Security’s Agency’s secret seven-year collection of Americans’ telephone records — which was found to be unlawful in another ACLU lawsuit, ACLU v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decided Rocket v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm by Barry Eagar
Citing MID Sydney Pty Ltd v Australian Tourism Co Ltd (1998) 90 FCR 236, traders conducting their business from the Chifley Tower building in Sydney would not have infringed the plaintiff's trade mark ("Chifley Tower") if they used that name in good faith as the name of their place of business. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
No. 6,712,702 on in-game advertising in network games.Parallel Processing Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Sony v Cohen: Sony says an artist who’s trying to terminate transfers can’t use album artwork in advertising his work. [read post]