Search for: "State v. Noble" Results 441 - 460 of 911
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 12:33 pm by Eric Goldman
Barnes & Noble * Court Disregards Check-the-Box Agreement and Doesn’t Enforce Venue Clause — Dunstan v. comScore * Forum Selection Clause in “Submerged” Terms of Service Presumptively Unenforceable — Hoffman v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 2:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It is settled that an accused's right to cross-examine witnesses and present a criminal defense is not absolute nor can the Sixth Amendment be read to "confer the right to present testimony free from the legitimate demands of the adversarial system as ruled in United States v Nobles and Michigan v Lucas. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:47 am by Steven Chadwick
On April 8, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of the State of Ohio issued its opinion in the matter of Walker v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bennett Capers's "The Crime of Loving: Loving, Lawrence, and Beyond," which appears in Loving v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 1:43 am by rhapsodyinbooks
This noble ideal cannot be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:35 pm by John Stigi
 Evidence based upon a few isolated quotes stating the deal was accelerated or reflecting one director’s belief, or perhaps mere bargaining position, of the Company’s value does not state a claim for bad faith in this context. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Noble Roman's also states that B & MP used the Noble Roman's trademarks in connection with the sale of non-Noble Roman's pizza and other menu items and that such use of the trademarks was without the authorization or consent of Noble Roman's. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:40 am by Judy Selby
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., an Ohio federal court relied on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Clapper v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
Vice Chancellor Noble’s decision last year granted summary judgment dismissing Blaustein’s action. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court was sensitive to just this concern when it defined religion broadly for purposes of the conscientious objector statute governing military service in the 1965 case of United States v. [read post]