Search for: "State v. Owings"
Results 441 - 460
of 9,913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2015, 4:50 am
In the case of Estate of Burns v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 5:47 am
You can add in cases like Weiss v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 3:00 am
The case is Thompson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:49 pm
Consistent with our precedent and the purpose of the special duty rule, we reiterate that plaintiffs must establish that a municipality owed them a special duty when they assert a negligence claim based on actions taken by a municipality acting in a governmental capacity. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:12 am
" The dissenting opinion states in conclusion, "Although we owe the NRC considerable deference, the NRC owes the public a rational and reasonable explanation why it would exclude from its rule consideration of terrorist air attacks on nuclear facilities. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am
Supreme Court handle the appeal in Perry v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 11:57 am
In North Pacific Roadbuilders Ltd. v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:42 am
The New Mexico Supreme Court ruled in Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 6:44 pm
Biomedical Patent Management Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
In Shaw v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
The Court, in North Counties Engineering Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:10 am
In this unusual case, Zanani v Scott Seidler Family Trust 2023 NY Slip Op 00836Decided on February 14, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department, the attorney brought the claim for legal fees as a special proceedings, seeing a declaratory judgment that he was owed money. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:15 pm
Blachana LLC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
In Estate of McCall v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:17 am
The dust is starting to settle in the widely publicised case of Bragg v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 3:57 pm
Roarty v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 3:57 pm
Roarty v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 7:48 am
As the district court aptly stated, "in common parlance, [what] ERISA fiduciaries owe participants [are] duties of prudence and loyalty," Bunch, 532 F. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 9:26 am
Tutt, "[H]ow important is the text of Article I, Section 10, which explicitly divests the states of anything on the war powers? [read post]
