Search for: "State v. Perez"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2015, 11:30 am
Perez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 7:36 am
In Perez v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:46 pm
Bashaw v Republic State Mortgage Co, No 01-14-00427-CV (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:22 am
Perez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:57 pm
Finally, the justices asked the federal government to file a brief conveying its views on Loomis v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:29 am
But the 29th Annual Edward V. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:20 am
The trial judge applied the learned intermediary doctrine, rejecting plaintiff's allegation that the so-called DTC exception applied pursuant to Perez v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 5:51 am
Perez, 280 F.3d 318, 340 (3d Cir. 2002); United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
Castillo-Perez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
Updated: Amicus briefs in support of the Proposition 8 respondents and DOMA respondent Edith Windsor
1 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Perry and respondent Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
Perez v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:28 am
De Alba Pagan, 33 F.3d 125, 129 (1st Cir. 1994) (citing United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:01 pm
Perez-Perez, No. 06-30341 (10-22-07). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:27 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:02 pm
App’x at 642 (quoting United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:36 am
This ruling reverses the district court's contrary finding on summary judgment.The case is Mercedes v. [read post]
