Search for: "State v. Pope"
Results 441 - 460
of 534
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
., United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
(The case is EPIC, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
Compare Posey v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:24 am
Vicarious Liability of Catholic Church In the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Doe v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:24 am
Vicarious Liability of Catholic Church In the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Doe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 4:26 am
"Pope said the court could [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:29 am
State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:36 am
United States, 429 U.S. 17 (1976); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:02 am
State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 12:27 pm
Eneh v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:42 pm
The debaters are constitutional law scholars Gerard V. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm
Continuing with my occasional (although becoming somewhat frequent) posts on NAFTA Chapter 11 non-discrimination standards, there is a new decision to talk about: Merrill & Ring v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:18 pm
In other news, early reports now indicate that the Pope is Catholic. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 7:36 am
The funeral picketing case (Snyder v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:48 am
Pope Download Associated Ins. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:48 am
Pope Download Associated Ins. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
Contrary to petitioners' contention, however, the petition fails to state a cause of action for fraud or constructive fraud against either HSBC or respondent law firm because it fails to make a "factually supported allegation" of misrepresentation (Pope v Saget, 29 AD3d 437, 441, lv denied 8 NY3d 803; see Simmons v Washing Equip. [read post]
