Search for: "State v. Reinhardt"
Results 441 - 460
of 528
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2009, 5:56 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:19 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:51 am
In dissent, Berzon, joined by Schroeder, Reinhardt, Wardlaw, and Paez, argued that the evidence was disputed, and that the court could not say it was harmless.U.S. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:46 pm
In Romer v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 6:53 am
See also Smelt v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Reinhardt wrote that, if DOMA blocks such benefits, it is unconstitutional. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 6:50 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:52 pm
That message comes from Judge Stephan Reinhardt of 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:34 pm
It's thus fun to see the two of them have at it, as they did in the majority and dissent in the recent criminal case of United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:02 pm
If you're interested in some engaging opinion-writing, check out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:58 pm
Case in point, courtesy of Eugene Volokh: a Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
" He briefly discusses Romer v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 11:44 pm
Carver v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, decided Sarei v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:33 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:49 pm
Union Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
The goal of nationwide uniformity driving the Sentencing Guidelines is not well-served when we apply an enhancement for all burglaries in one state but none in California, our most populous state. [read post]
