Search for: "State v. Royal" Results 441 - 460 of 2,217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am by Nedim Malovic
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are cumulative.Reputation of… [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm by Jamison Chung
  In Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4-5 December 2019. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Barry Sookman
The EU White paper on AI recommended this approach stating: A risk-based approach is important to help ensure that the regulatory intervention is proportionate. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Barry Sookman
The EU White paper on AI recommended this approach stating: A risk-based approach is important to help ensure that the regulatory intervention is proportionate. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
GOOGLE LLC, 18-15712 https://t.co/E09nPYbXhq 2020-03-12 Defamation law reform Final Report – LCO-CDO https://t.co/7wQ7dagicu 2020-03-12 Bill C4 to implement the CUSMA given royal assent LEGISinfo – House Government Bill C-4 (43-1) https://t.co/kGiYOQ7hgy 2020-03-13 Damages for the tort or breach of privacy rights in the UK Reid v Price [2020] EWHC 594 (QB) (13 March 2020) https://t.co/Z2y8ZIb1rK 2020-03-14 [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 8:28 am
Thjose disruptions have spread through the cruise ship industry that itself has been the subject of several highly publicized incidents in which their ships were denied docking rights or otherwise where their passangers were quarantined (The coronavirus has sent shockwaves through the cruise industry, spurring Carnival, Royal Caribbean, and Norwegian Cruise Line to take drastic measures to keep their passengers from getting sick).Most Caribbean States have begun to prepare for… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Thomas J. McSweeney
” Bracton even makes an appearance in the case Pierson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 1:55 am by Jocelyn Hutton
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Pay Equity Act The new Pay Equity Act received royal assent on December 13, 2018, and will implement wage fairness by comparing jobs usually done by women with different jobs usually done by men. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am by UKSC Blog
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 1:31 am by UKSC Blog
On Wednesday 12 and Thursday 13 February 2020, the Court will also hear the appeal of Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake and Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home). [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Raincoast Conservation Foundation v. [read post]