Search for: "State v. Selle" Results 441 - 460 of 14,281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  As far as we can gather Plaintiffs were offered a deal in which they would sell their real property to A, who would then turn around and sell it to B, at a profit. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:16 am
Of course, any state law that created this result would make uniform regulation impossible, and would impermissibly stand as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purpose and objectives of Congress in creating the Exchange Act's self-regulatory regime, including the portion of that regime applicable to registered clearing agencies under Section 17A.Whistler Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Great Northern Insurance Co. v Kobrand Corp. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm by John W. Arden
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm by Bennett Cyphers
A data broker has been selling raw location data about individual people to federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, EFF has learned. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm
So earlier today I mentioned the cert grant in Salazar v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 12:54 pm by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
” Like many states, Georgia has a dram shop law that applies to anyone who “sells, furnishes, or sells alcoholic beverages. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 12:54 pm by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
” Like many states, Georgia has a dram shop law that applies to anyone who “sells, furnishes, or sells alcoholic beverages. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]