Search for: "State v. Sherry" Results 441 - 460 of 588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2022, 6:26 am by John Jascob
By Anne Sherry, J.D.A whistleblower who alerted the SEC to misconduct at Citigroup must share a $27 million award with a colleague. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 5:54 am by John Jascob
The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim and entered judgment for the defendants immediately, without allowing leave to amend.Standard of review. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:56 am by Unknown
By Anne Sherry, J.D.In amicus briefs before the Supreme Court, SIFMA and the U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:09 am by John Jascob
By Anne Sherry, J.D.A restructuring maneuver that forced bondholders to accept reduced payment or get nothing at all did not violate the Trust Indenture Act, the Second Circuit held. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:40 am by John Jascob
By Anne Sherry, J.D.Retaliatory intent is a required element of a whistleblower claim under Sarbanes-Oxley, the Second Circuit held. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 5:21 pm by John Jascob
By Anne Sherry, J.D.A lawsuit alleging that an underwriter participated in a scheme to subvert Nasdaq’s listing requirements failed to allege scienter. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 6:33 am by John Jascob
While the court granted Morningstar’s motion to dismiss on the second allegation, it found that the SEC stated a claim as to the first and third.Motion to dismiss. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 10:40 am
I have a column that appears today on FindLaw, discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:42 am by Richard S. Zackin
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Minarsky v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:13 am by John Jascob
The state has no compelling interest in censoring speech it finds “repugnant,” the court wrote, and the First Amendment does not allow remedying unwanted speech with enforced silence (Honeyfund.com, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:13 pm
Raich is hard to reconcile with United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
the product as a vodka, displaying it among the vodkas and in some cases expressly stating it to be a vodka. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 3:00 pm by Ronald Mann
 For a while, during the argument of Seth Waxman (for POM) and Melissa Sherry (Assistant to the Solicitor General, on behalf of the FDA), it seemed that the Justices were taking it easy after the heated argument in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]