Search for: "State v. Sims"
Results 441 - 460
of 506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The court invoked language from the Supreme Court’s 1968 decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm
Sims). [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Víctor M. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 In re Sims, No. 06-0644 In an inmate's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging excessive force, inmate's petition for writ of mandamus challenging an order requiring him to produce his mental health records is granted because: 1) a plaintiff does not forfeit the psychotherapist-patient privilege merely by asserting a claim for injuries that do not include emotional damage, or by stating that he suffers from depression or… [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:35 am
In Ambac Assurance Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Sims, and Loving v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:19 pm
Spy/Cat v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 9:08 am
In addition, the Act does not address whether online marketplace facilitators qualify as dealers, an issue currently pending before the Louisiana Supreme Court under Normand v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cir. 2007): Gamco alleged infringement by Multimedia’s central determinant system, as operated in the New York State Lottery. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SAN State of MI v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat) Germany Regional Court Munich I partly rejects Bavarian state government’s attempt to use copyright laws to prevent reprints of Nazi newspaper by British publisher Peter McGee (IPKat) (The IP Factor) India Delhi High Court restores PPL’s right to sue for copyright infringement on behalf of its members: PPL v Hotel Gold Regency & Ors (Spicy IP) Punitive damages as effective penalty (International Law Office) Religion and IP:… [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
gain upper hand in Blu-ray DRM battle (Ars Technica) Africa South African Times report on state of African music, lack of support and protection (Afro-IP) Australia Australian Copyright Tribunal: consumer valuation of copyright: Audio-Visual Copyright Society (t/a Screenrights) v Foxtel and Re PPCA (IPKat) (IP finance) Innovation patents in Australia. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
(United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:06 pm
Sims, were wrongly decided, I take it that both have been absorbed into the canon under the rubric of the constitutional necessity of “one-person/one-vote. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Stegall (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
Nonetheless, Cases like Terre Neuve Sarl v Yewdale Ltd [2020] and Etihad Airways PJSC v Flother [2020] reveal complexities in ascertaining commercial expectations and business efficacy. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 7:03 pm
Thus anticipating the political philosophy of Hobbes, Machiavelli states that the moral and justice does not pre-exist to the state, but they are result of state. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm
THE LAW IN NEW JERSEY We should expect a high court ruling in New Jersey very soon as the Supreme Court of the State of New Jersey just heard oral argument on October 14, 2015 in Templo Fuente De Vida Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:19 pm
In Riley v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]