Search for: "State v. Soft"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 7:44 am
The Supreme Court majority in McCutcheon v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:09 am
In Stanifer v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am
Joh v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:51 pm
United States Supreme Court Indicates Possible Intention to Grant Certiorari in Magee v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:07 am
The UCC 9 v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 1:38 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 5:16 am
It's just part of an effort to make Biden look soft on China. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:57 am
Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:33 am
The international soft drink maker relied on Dean Panos, a partner with Jenner in Chicago, to beat back a $1.26 billion default judgment in Wisconsin state court in a trade secrets case. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
* BREAKING: CJEU says that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive but Member States can protect themHere's another insightful take by Eleonora on the surreal CJEU decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment, a reference for a preliminary ruling from seemingly hyperlink-loving Member State, Sweden, which was supposed to address linking and copyright. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
Solomon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:20 am
The Supreme Court’s five-to-four decision in McCutcheon v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:17 am
* Clarks v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:02 am
As stated in Athey v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:50 am
The case, BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC. v. [read post]
