Search for: "State v. V. A." Results 441 - 460 of 258,351
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2024, 10:25 am by Antonios Baris
Bohdan Widła highlights the divergence in copyright protection for application programming interfaces (APIs) between the US and EU following the Google LLC v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 10:24 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Sentiments like these no doubt contributed to the Trump administrations efforts to terminate TPS designations for Haiti, Sudan, Nicaragua, and El Salvador, a decision that was challenged by TPS beneficiaries and their U.S. citizen children in federal court in Ramos v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:50 am by Dan Farber
Remember that this is the group that thought Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 30 July 2024 there was a statement in open court in the case of Singh v Cartland and a return date hearing the case of Synnovis Services v Persons Unknown. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:00 am by Ezra Rosser
Outka present it at the Poverty Law V Conference at Indiana Maurer. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 The UK Supreme Court decided, in the 2018 Miller v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:07 am by Marty Lederman
(The United States is not a State Party to the treaty, but most European nations are, including the UK, France, and Germany.) [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was sufficient… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
SEIU appealed the Supreme Court's ruling.Citing Matter of Taylor v Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 182 AD3d 815 and Matter of Ortiz v Simmons, 67 AD3d 1208, the Appellate Division, noting that one of SEIU's members involved in the instant litigation had retired from the Fire Department, explained "so much of the second amended petition/complaint as was asserted by him is not academic, as the determination that there was sufficient… [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:19 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Pappas v B & G Holding Co. (2024 NY Slip Op 51218(U) [Sup Ct, Bronx County Sept. 6, 2024]), was reminiscent of the Worbes case I blogged about and then substituted in as counsel helping to bring the case to a successful conclusion – but with the parties’ roles reversed. [read post]