Search for: "State v. V. M. S." Results 441 - 460 of 28,582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
Nando’s states that their marks are infringed on the outside sign, inside the Fernando’s restaurant and on the menu.Aziz claims that he is being bullied into changing his company’s name and had no intention of copying Nando’s - he wanted to sell Peri Peri chicken, being of Portuguese origin, using the Portuguese chicken as a symbol of the cuisine. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
Veazie, 8 How. 251, 255–256 (1850); United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:16 am
" (Paragraph 42)and:"The rule in Hildebrand as we have stated it in paragraph [42] above was and remains good law. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:25 pm
This clause, the high court has stated, “indicates” that Congress’s “purpose” in enacting the FAA “was to make arbitration agreements as enforceable as other contracts, but not more so. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Rachel Bercovitz, Todd Carney
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm by Ryan Scoville
They didn’t do this, and I’m skeptical that they could. [read post]