Search for: "State v. Wales"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,631
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
The agreement had a somewhat unusual governing law and jurisdiction clause in that it was governed by German law but provided that the Courts of England and Wales have jurisdiction over any dispute. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Tugendhat J was therefore bound by the Court of Appeal’s decision in Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Bairstow [2003] EWCA Viv 321; [2004] Ch 1. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:11 pm
R (RJM) (FC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] UKHL 63 This House of Lords judgment is now just under two weeks old, but I think it is still worthy of comment here. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 11:52 am
Alexander Williams, of Fredonia, in the county of San Saba and State of Texas, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in Animal-Traps…. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
On 3 June 2020, the Supreme Court heard this case in which the Director of Public Prosecutions in England and Wales intervened. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
v) Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:44 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am
This right is of the highest importance, especially when the defendant has ventured to criticise the government of the day, or those who hold authority or power in the state. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:38 am
SanDisk Corporation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics and others [2007] EWHC 332 (Ch), an England and Wales Chancery Division of Mr Justice Pumfrey yesterday (posted today in full on BAILII) is a case in point.Philips and others owned a number of MP3 patents licensed by Sisvel. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Case C-484/14 McFadden is a reference for a preliminary ruling from CJEU-loving Member State Germany, seeking clarification as regards the liability of a freely-accessible wi-fi provider for third-party copyright infringements committed via that wireless network. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
GSS Group v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:51 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
The overlooked majority: the limits of Whitney v CIRRichard Thomas (First Tier Tribunal, UK)7. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In this article, I shall turn my attention to the split decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs [2021] EWCA Civ 1374, in which parallel efforts to name DABUS as an inventor have also been rejected, with Thaler’s appeal being dismissed despite a weighty dissent by Lord Justice Birss. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In this article, I shall turn my attention to the split decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales in Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs [2021] EWCA Civ 1374, in which parallel efforts to name DABUS as an inventor have also been rejected, with Thaler’s appeal being dismissed despite a weighty dissent by Lord Justice Birss. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 4:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 pm
Clause 3.2 stated they they would not publish, in any jurisdiction, any articles or statements which “refer to” Mr Mionis or his “immediate family”. [read post]
