Search for: "State v. Wines"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am
It is the State and its Courts that have authority to coerce a Party who has not complied with his bargain. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
Lindesay Low, Senior Legal Counsel at the Scotch Whisky Association, has shared his thoughts on the recent case of Viiniverla Oy V Sosiaali- ja terveysalan lupa- ja valvontavirasto. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 1:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 2:54 pm
Festa built on Victor Wine and Liquor, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
Cranmer accepted a commission to write a propaganda treatise in the king’s interest, stating the course he proposed and defending it by arguments from Scripture, the Fathers, and the decrees of general councils. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:03 pm
Its role in the Apple case is framed by a 1977 Supreme Court case, United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Titanic v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 12:01 pm
King v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:05 am
” Hartfield v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
But Smith sounded most like Reynolds v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Southern Wine & Spirits of Illinois v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 7:02 am
He had consumed one or two glasses of wine shortly before the altercation. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 1:59 pm
See, e.g., Murphy v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:50 pm
” The court thus distinguishes Walker v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 7:46 am
Erhard Milch), and NMT 4 (U.S.A. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 2:12 pm
IVDP then appealed to the General Court on several grounds.The decisionIn Case T‑659/14 IVDP v OHIM (PORT CHARLOTTE) General Court held:“…it is clear that neither the provisions of Regulation No 491/2009, nor those of Regulation No 207/2009, state that the protection under the former must be construed as being exhaustive in the sense that that protection cannot be supplemented, beyond its particular scope, by another system of protection. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:11 am
See Sam’s Wines & Liquors, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 2:23 am
A couple of glasses of wine. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:14 am
Its description for the mark stated “alcoholic beverages except beers; wines and still wines and sparkling wines; beverages containing wine, namely, sparkling fruit wine and still fruit wine; ready to drink alcoholic beverages except beers. [read post]
