Search for: "Stern v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 484
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) Web host provider, Portlane, protests against anti-piracy threats (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom British government considers bandwidth speed limits for repeat file-sharers (Excess Copyright) Downloaders not to be cut off after all – but Culture Minister won’t be there to see it (not) happen (IPKat) New UK survey finds stern letters from ISPs not enough to stop P2P use after all (Ars Technica) United States… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
(Ars Technica) Web host provider, Portlane, protests against anti-piracy threats (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom British government considers bandwidth speed limits for repeat file-sharers (Excess Copyright) Downloaders not to be cut off after all – but Culture Minister won’t be there to see it (not) happen (IPKat) New UK survey finds stern letters from ISPs not enough to stop P2P use after all (Ars Technica) United States… [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:00 am
In Schwartzman v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
(Not a huge deal...but try to prevent having to do that)She was nervous...and it showed.Video 2: Stern v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:09 am
His verdict in Benedi v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
United Air Lines, Inc. and Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
Stern, on behalf of Anna Nicole Smith's Estate (and for the benefit of her young daughter, Dannielynn) asked the United States Supreme Court to unfreeze the case and lift the stay, allowing the money to be paid. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 1:00 am
V. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
Vance, STATE LAW PREFERENCE ACTIONS: STILL ALIVE AFTER SHERWOOD PARTNERS V. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
Douglas Floyd, THREE FACES OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AFTER THE DEMISE OF UNITED MINE WORKERS v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:12 pm
Saffran v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
the Department of Justice representing the United States as intervenor has defended the constitutionality of this statute. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:30 pm
The Sentencing Guidelines’ decision, United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:48 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice'Year' Read to Mean Calendar Year in Ruling Finding Indictment Timely Under 18 USC §1001 United States v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 9:55 am
Marc Stern, AJCongress general counsel, said AJCongress did not participate because they believe that in light of recent precedents allowing greater church-state interaction the challenge to city funding will be unsuccessful. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:43 pm
Clinton, 48 M.J. 84 (C.A.A.F. 1998), and United States v. [read post]
