Search for: "Stevens v. Marks"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
The first is Murphy v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
The first was Christie v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:58 am
The first was Steven T. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie looks at Digital Realty Trust Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Implications for Public Administration from Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 8:07 am
Contents include:Linda C Reif, The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and Networked Governance: Improving the Role of Human Rights Ombudsman Institutions as National Remedies Gauthier de Beco, Protecting the Invisible: An Intersectional Approach to International Human Rights Law Robert Spano, Intermediary Liability for Online User Comments under the European Convention on Human Rights Neil Graffin, Gäfgen v Germany, the Use of Threats and the Punishment of Those Who… [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am
Cuero “marks at least the fourth such reversal of a … ruling” by Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw of the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:08 am
“The critical element is that both suits arise out of the same subject matter or series of alleged wrongs” (Cherico, Cherico & Assoc. v Midollo, 67 AD3d 622, 622 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
As Steven R. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am
With this sweeping new rule, New York has become the first state in the nation to require all of its criminal trial judges to issue so-called “Brady orders” in every case (named after the 1963 case of Brady v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
At The Economist, Steven Mazie reports on Monday’s oral argument in Epic Systems v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
At Education Week, Mark Walsh reports on the grant in in Janus v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
The judge begins the opinion by explaining that “Plaintiff Jason Steven Molthan has filed this pro se actionunder 42 U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am
Supreme Court justices’ speaking engagements typically make headlines for what happens inside, not outside, the venue. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:36 am
Commentary comes from Brian Miller at Forbes, who calls the grant “good news for public employees who have been fighting for years for the right to decide for themselves whether or not to support a union,” Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, Ross Runkel at his eponymous blog, and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who observes that a ruling against the union in this case will “mark the end of fair share and the likely demise of public sector… [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:11 pm
Dunoff & Mark A. [read post]
