Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice" Results 441 - 460 of 700
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2011, 11:46 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:34 am
Breyer limited the discussion in his 3-page dissent to U.S. opinions -- opinions by him and since-retired Justice John Paul Stevens that cited foreign law. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 10:17 am by Jeffrey Kahn
Shipley ran the State Department’s Passport Office from 1928 to 1955. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:23 am by Robert Chesney
As a general matter, under Part V of Justice Stevens’ (plurality) opinion in Hamdan, all three military commissions might be deemed to be “hybrid” military commissions–meaning that the commissions acted simultaneously as a military government commission and a law-of-war commission. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:30 am by Marissa Miller
Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in on the first question presented in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Justice Stevens accepted the validity of these state interests as unquestionably legitimate. [read post]
Department of Justice, the Court upheld a Tampa Bay district that “comprise[d] a predominantly urban, low-income population . . . whose white and black members alike share a similarly depressed economic condition. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:37 am by David Kravets
Here is a summary of important cases that have been granted a hearing by the Supreme Court: An abandoned FBI vehicle-tracking device/Wired.com United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am by Joshua Matz
” At Concurring Opinions, Daniel Solove discusses United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:17 pm by lsammis
Deposition of Fran Greifenberger on July 7th, 2011, in relation to State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
  In the Court’s most recent foray, in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:25 am by John Nolon
  Justice Stevens stated that: “[t]he harms associated with climate change are serious and well recognized. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:09 am by Peggy McGuinness
In this way, Texas can still honor its duty under the Supremacy Clause to honor the treaty obligations of the United States, just as Justice Stevens has implored us to do. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Kiran Bhat
United States to the Federal Circuit; the Blog of Legal Times has coverage. [read post]