Search for: "Strauss v. Strauss"
Results 441 - 460
of 538
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Pulka v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Leo Strauss, The Crisis of Modern Natural Right: Burke, in Natural Right and History (1953). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
Rev. 693 (1976) --Poe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 7:25 pm
Jude Medical (IP Frontline) (PatLit) District Court N D California grants summary judgment of invalidity based on on-sale bar: PartsRiver, Inc v Shopzilla, Inc et al (EDTexweblog.com) District Court N D Illinois: Subjective colours require definition to avoid indefiniteness: On the First Ltd v Seiko Epson Corp (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Supreme Court asked to hear Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc – Should obviousness be determined by the court or… [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:24 pm
[7] See also Levi Strauss Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:13 pm
As affirmed by Gummow J in Wingate Marketing Pty Ltd v Levi Strauss & Co[30], “whilst a trade mark remains on goods, it functions as an indicator of the person who attached or authorised the initial use of the mark”. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:38 am
Kansas v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
It seems unlikely that such oppositions will be filed.CCF previously sought to intervene in Strauss v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
KG v OHIM, Wedl & Hofmann GmbH) . [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 3:09 pm
Publius would recognize the various themes that are the subject of essays in Part V of this Handbook (Mark Brandon, Oren Gross, Wayne Moore, David Strauss, Ernest Young, John Dinan, Jamal Green, Gerard Magliocca, Vicki Jackson, Heinz Klug, Elizabeth Beaumont, Maxwell Stearns, Paul Kahn). [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
The California Supreme Court swiftly followed suit in Strauss v Horton, upholding the passage of Proposition 8, but applying that referendum prospectively, thereby preserving the approximately 18,000 marriages that had been performed prior to the passage of the referendum; and perhaps unwittingly creating an arbitrary class of persons to which other gays can point in an equal protection analysis. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Blue Buffalo Company Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 6:07 am
Leblang, and Jason Sison, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, on Monday, November 19, 2018 Tags: Carl Icahn, Dell, Fairness review, Hedge funds, IPOs, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder meetings, Shareholder voting Bull or Bear? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:08 am
Burdick, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, on Sunday, January 22, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Antitrust, Board composition, Boards of Directors, Brexit, CFIUS, Cybersecurity, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Europe, Executive Compensation, International governance, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, UK Mutual Funds As Venture Capitalists? [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:37 pm
But it was successful on appeal to the Full Court (E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Limited [2009] FCAFC 27).By cross-claim in the Federal Court, Lion Nathan applied to have the registered trade mark removed from the register on the grounds of non-use from 7 May 2004 to 8 May 2007.The Full Court upheld the primary judge's finding that Lion Nathan's non-use application was made out and that Gallo's trademark should be removed from the register. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Strauss] will serve in that capacity until a permanent successor is in place. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 9th Circuit changes dilution standard: Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
