Search for: "Strickland v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-402Issues: (1) Whether National Cable & Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), rather than Strickland v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm by Mark Zamora
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
Experimental Psychol., Learning, Memory & Cognition, 378 (2011). [4] Strickland v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
United States, involving whether juries must make the determination whether qualifying predicate offenses “were committed on occasions different from one another” under the Armed Career Criminal Act sentencing enhancement scheme. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:06 pm
The federal district court’s decision last week (Issa v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:17 pm by Jeff Gamso
United States, 575 F.2d 515, 521 (5th Cir.1978) (poor health); Dows v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:29 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
New Relists Patterson v. [read post]