Search for: "Strickland v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 498
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:19 am
In Hawkins v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
Tompkins‟ case comports with the United States and Florida Constitutions. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
See also United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:39 pm
United States (06-6911), and as amicus supporting petitioners in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 7:06 pm
Since counsel framed the claim exclusively in therms of the United States Constitution that Copurt applied the federal test for IAC set forth in Strickland v Washington (466 US 668); see People v McDonald, 1 NY3d 109, 114-115).On appeal Ms. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 3:11 pm
United States; Nicasio Mendoza-Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 12:57 pm
Last week, I reported on the Sixth Circuit decision in VanHook v Anderson recognizing that post-Strickland decisions from the United States Supreme Court have tightened the duty of investigation required by defense counsel. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am
Since the Court’s 1984 ruling in Strickland v Washington, the United States Supreme Court has applied a two part test for determining whether counsel was ineffective: (a) whether there was a breach of counsel’s duty to the defendant; and, (b) “but for” that error, the defendant stood a reasonable chance for acquittal. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Strickland Northern District of Ohio at ClevelandSUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:38 pm
Wrinkles instead claimed that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 2:47 pm
NIXON, 543 U.S. 175 (2004); UNITED STATES v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:11 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States denied Bell's petition for writ of certiorari. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:04 pm
United States, 66 M.J. 114 (C.A.A.F. 2008). [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:38 pm
Ed. 2d 640 (1981); see also United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
Petitioners’ merits briefs are due Monday in United States v. [read post]
