Search for: "T-7 Inc"
Results 441 - 460
of 8,452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
Jul. 7, 2023) Discussion of district court opinion. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:18 am
” Id. at *7. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:18 am
” Id. at *7. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Last Thursday’s split summary-judgment decision in the case that the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought against Ripple Labs, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Sturgis Public Schools NG 598 U.S. 142 7 2/28/23 145, Orig. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Sturgis Public Schools NG 598 U.S. 142 7 2/28/23 145, Orig. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
AT&T, 310 F. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Harper, Decided June 27, 2023 Amid Debate Around SCOTUS Gerrymandering Case, Stanford’s Michael McConnell Shares Insights on Questions of Federalism The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on December 7 in what is widely seen as one of the most significant cases in the country’s history to address fundamental questions of federalism. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
Brown, Leifer, Slatkin & Berns (1992) 7 CA4th 27. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Candidate, Stanford University), Nicholas T. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
Chewey, Inc., OSHRC Docket No. 19-0868, 2022 WL 1009607 (February 22, 2022). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
The TM part of this might need revisiting in light of Abitron; the court earlier held that use of a mark in the US wasn’t required to bring Lanham Act claims, but subsequently Meenaxi Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 12:47 am
Supreme Court (SC) in Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm
Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 2:31 pm
This week in Medytox, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:43 am
This week in Medytox, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14L (“SLB 14L”),[8] issued in November 2021, reversed the staff’s views on paragraphs (i)(5)[9] and (i)(7),[10] which limit a company’s ability to exclude proposals if there are significant social policy issues.[11] While companies have not frequently sought to exclude proposals under paragraph (i)(5), paragraph (i)(7) was one of the most common bases for seeking exclusion.[12] SLB 14L reversed a position that had been in place for… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
On June 17, 1963, the Supreme Court sided with the DOJ, holding that the merger violated section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
[xiii] Unsurprisingly, given the immediate impact of inflation on food, the fresh meal delivery service faltered and Jenny Craig didn’t even start with a Chapter 11 filing, it went straight for Chapter 7 liquidation with no buyer interested. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
[xiii] Unsurprisingly, given the immediate impact of inflation on food, the fresh meal delivery service faltered and Jenny Craig didn’t even start with a Chapter 11 filing, it went straight for Chapter 7 liquidation with no buyer interested. [read post]
