Search for: "T. K."
Results 441 - 460
of 20,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 6:41 am
Lawyer hater Philip K. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
“ Die PozMatch Message Boards neigen dazu sei voller Positivität, wirklich Liebe und Wunsch. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
Hırsızlık, dolandırıcılık ve tehdit gibi suçlar açıkça sayılmak suretiyle uzlaştırma kapsamına alınmıştır. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:10 am
You can find the details about what expenses can (and can't) be paid with 401(k) plan assets in my recent column in Employee Benefit News. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:10 am
You can find the details about what expenses can (and can't) be paid with 401(k) plan assets in my recent column in Employee Benefit News. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:11 pm
Five legal staffers isn't necessarily front-page news, but you have to check out how K&L Gates went about this round of cuts. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:47 am
Unfortunately, we don't have a time machine or the late George Carlin who played Rufus from the future who supplied the lads with that time machine. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:47 am
Unfortunately, we don't have a time machine or the late George Carlin who played Rufus from the future who supplied the lads with that time machine. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 3:05 am
t? [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
As a consequence, it is irrelevant that the evidence regarding the merger has been submitted after the appeal had been filed.The present case differs from the case underlying decision T 428/08 in several respects. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:26 am
leri her geçen gün kötüye giden küçük i? [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:31 am
So the moral of the story is simple: Don’t touch a 401 (k) right before bankruptcy, unless you absolutely have to in order to file the case! [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:52 am
Lawyers are mistaken if they don't think XBRL will impact their practice. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 3:42 am
Dig this 170-page Form 10-K for the US Government! [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 12:30 pm
Over at Dealb%k. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
As far as I can see, there is no clear answer in the case law to the question whether a patent proprietor can revert to the patent as granted in opposition appeal proceedings if it has not requested maintenance as granted before the Opposition Division (OD).In decisions such as T 105/09 and T 755/00 the patent proprietor has been allowed to do so, provided that this behaviour was not the expression of an abuse of procedure.However, nowadays, some (perhaps most) Boards see things… [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:59 pm
k) : VEK? [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
T 331/87 [3]) according to which the replacement or removal of a claim feature is admissible provided that it does not require any real modification of other features [to compensate for the change], there is also a risk that it is applied in a wrong way (as in the present case […]) because it is not clear what is meant by “no real modification”. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 10:34 am
So, in this season of giving thanks, a big "Thank You" to CALI for supporting law students' learning needs and for sending little gifts like cool highlighters (sorry, can't photograph them here since ours are all gone!) [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:01 pm
See also T 681/01 [2.1.1], where the board emphasized that the normal rule of claim construction is that the terms used in a claim should be given their ordinary meaning in the context of the claim in which they appear. [read post]
