Search for: "Talent v. Talent" Results 441 - 460 of 2,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2020, 1:36 pm
For those of you looking to comment on the Pearson v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:50 am by Afro Leo
In this issue Prof Karjiker provides his perspective on Herbal Zone v Infitech, a triumvirate of talent from CIPC (Sher-Muhammad Kahn, Christiaan Steyn and Warren Rossouw) unpack shape marks in a comprehensive exposé,  Chezanne Haighfrom Kisch IP takes a bite at the Kit Kat four finger decision, Darren Olivier provides tips for franchising, Alessia del Bianco provides an in-house perspective on creative IP management, Darren Margo is relaxed over the latest exchange… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:05 pm by Peter Tillers
I can only imagine how pleased they are to have acquired someone with Professor Leiter's unique set of talents). [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 10:16 am
It's already been nicely summarized by Vote For the Worst, a website that urges its readers to vote for the Idol that the website creators view as the least talented. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 1:33 pm
But on regards the rest of the common procedures to weddings, I have no talent for cooking, I dont like ironing, do not like to clean the house. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:02 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:57 am by VP/CEO, Integrity Marketing Solutions
We realize that many of our clients need someone like Ros on their staff, but people of her experience and talent are hard to find, and a challenge to afford. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:17 am
 Studies show that women get interrupted more (no matter how senior), passed over for promotions and raises (even though entitled) and reviewed negatively for similar traits celebrated and promoted in men (bossy v leadership, arrogant v confident, etc). [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 1:10 pm
 He didn't have the abilities (or talents) he now has. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 5:37 am by SHG
Segall is right, that’s worthy of notice, and raises some serious questions of what great legal talent isn’t being considered for the judiciary and why. [read post]