Search for: "Tax Analysis v. Irs" Results 441 - 460 of 602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm by Orin Kerr
United States, 267 U.S. 576 (1925), the IRS wanted to see if a couple had underreported their income on their federal income tax forms. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:11 pm
Pursuant to the case of Balbuena v IDR Realty LLC, Company-A and Company-B moved for an order compelling further depositions of plaintiffs with regard to immigration status and income tax returns. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:55 am by Eugene Volokh
I don’t agree with all the analysis (for instance, the O’Brien analysis strikes me as incorrect), but the bottom line seems right, under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Now, an alert reader has pointed out to me that the issue raised in the hypothetical was addressed by the Tax Court in a Summary Opinion in July of this year, Abdi v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm by S2KM Limited
Practice tips for minimizing the risk of an IRS settlement challenge. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
The executor should also file a written notice with the IRS that he/she is serving as the fiduciary of the estate. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 2:00 am by Gene Takagi
Analysis at Election Law BlogRob Reich: Empire of Pain about the Sackler family and the opioid crisis is a masterpiece. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 5:00 pm by Karen K. Hartford
MHPAEA compliance is no small task, and the consequences for noncompliance are high, including penalties of $110 per day for failure to furnish documentation on request, IRS excise taxes of $100 per day, potential litigation, and annual public disclosure by the Departments of the names of noncompliant plans and issuers. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:16 pm
Blog post-US Supreme Court Bankruptcy Watch: Readying for Stern v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 2:00 am by Sam Turco
The problem is, federal bankruptcy courts are, according to Smith, bypassing the required tax analysis demanded by IRC 221(d)(1) and just declaring private loans nondischargeable educational benefit. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
During post-conviction proceedings, Kulbicki argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging the use of the analysis, noting that the very agent who performed the analysis had conducted a study showing problems with the technique. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:07 am by Peter Mahler
For companies taxed as C corporations — as opposed to S corporations and other pass-through entities taxed as partnerships — because they are paid from after-tax income, declared dividends effectively are subject to double taxation at the company and shareholder levels. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:43 am
Webster, whose data analysis leads them to conclude that the USPTO may approve as many as 97% of the applications placed before it. [read post]
Coronavirus-related distributions are not subject to the 10 percent penalty tax on distributions before age 59-1/2, are eligible for reduced federal income tax withholding, and are subject to special tax rules that generally result in any taxable amount being spread over three years. [read post]