Search for: "Tea v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2011, 2:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Certain kinds of electioneering materials may be banned at and near polling places on election day; that’s what the Court held in Burson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:07 am
On the other hand, as the Receiver concedes, the Court wrote in WaIco Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:59 am
The Court granted review in two cases, but really only one was left pending:PD-0059-09, State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am by Eric Turkewitz
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
However, if a mark was registered or applied for before the dates of accession of new Member States, then the relevant territory, and therefore relevant public, is made up only of the States that composed the EU at the relevant time (Art. 165(4)(a)). [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Tribes usually try to avoid state regulation by asserting their immunity from state authority, and the Supreme Court decided a case affirming tribal immunity this year captioned Michigan v. [read post]