Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Ford"
Results 441 - 460
of 926
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
| Rights on photographs of fake social profiles | IPEC hears big claims | Spanish copyright reform | Court of Appeal for England and Wales’ decision in Interflora v M&S | IPEC on confusing business names in Anglian Windows Ltd v Anglian Roofline Ltd | Ford Denied Well-Known Trademark Protection in Russia | Crayola suit to prevent genericide and dilution in the… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm
The Supreme Court of Georgia in Ford v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:05 am
| Rights on photographs of fake social profiles | IPEC hears big claims | Spanish copyright reform | Court of Appeal for England and Wales’ decision in Interflora v M&S | IPEC on confusing business names in Anglian Windows Ltd v Anglian Roofline Ltd | Ford Denied Well-Known Trademark Protection in Russia | Crayola suit to prevent genericide and dilution in the US | … [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:11 pm
Numerous people have been injured, blinded or killed after these airbags sent metal and plastic shards flying through a vehicle. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
: Ford Denied Well-Known Trademark Protection in RussiaRussia’s Intellectual Property Court upheld a March decision by the country’s IP Office (Federal Service for Intellectual Property - Rospatent) to deny the Ford Motor Company's (FMC) application for well-known trademark protection for its company name and its iconic blue oval logo. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
First among them, of course, is marginally faster access to relist information, which is what I assume people mean when they mention “Big Data. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 12:44 pm
Recent reports indicate that four people have been killed and over one hundred and thirty nine have been injured due to the defective Takata airbags. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm
Dugger (1987) was written by, of all people, Justice Scalia. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 6:49 am
See e.g., Ford v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:33 am
People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm
DonovanRethinking People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:44 am
- BusinessweekDeath of man who was put in chokehold by NYPD ruled a homicide Married Spouses and Unjust Enrichment: Martin v SansomeChief Bill Blair: ‘Doug Ford is lying, and I am prepared to take legal action 12 movies with pivotal lessons featuring lawyers Rob Ford’s testimony at Lisi hearing can’t be used as evidence against him later Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11 Federal court rules Microsoft must disclose overseas… [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
" But a rather angry sounding PRCA rejected the offer and accused the CLA of "downplaying" the issue by limiting the people who could attend. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
In New York Times v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:39 pm
Whem and State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]