Search for: "The United States Patent Office"
Results 441 - 460
of 9,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 4:22 am
As a fee-funded agency, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) must periodically assess and adjust fees to ensure our fee collections finance the aggregate costs necessary to register and maintain accurate and reliable trademarks. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of… [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:15 am
The issue of AI inventorship in the United States remains at large following the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Thaler v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:15 am
The issue of AI inventorship in the United States remains at large following the Supreme Court’s denial of cert in Thaler v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: AI inventorship comments due, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) seeks nominations to two advisory committees; Oprah’s company settles a trademark dispute with a podcast; and high-profile pharmaceutical company CEOs testify before the Senate on insulin prices. [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:15 am
This week in Other Barks & Bites: AI inventorship comments due, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) seeks nominations to two advisory committees; Oprah’s company settles a trademark dispute with a podcast; and high-profile pharmaceutical company CEOs testify before the Senate on insulin prices. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:00 am
After the dismissal, Pure Hemp moved for attorney fees, stating two bases for relief: “(1) UCANN’s prosecution counsel had allegedly committed inequitable conduct by copying text from a piece of prior art” and did not disclose the prior art to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and “(2) UCANN’s litigation counsel … purportedly took conflicting positions in its representation of UCANN… [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:16 am
Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit works to protect Microsoft and its customers from digital threats. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:15 am
On Tuesday, the European Patent Office (EPO) announced the 12 inventors and inventor teams that have been selected as finalists for the 2023 European Inventor Award. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:15 am
On Tuesday, the European Patent Office (EPO) announced the 12 inventors and inventor teams that have been selected as finalists for the 2023 European Inventor Award. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Do you know if, or when, Canadian police officers are supposed to tell you why you are under arrest and let you know your rights? [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of… [read post]
8 May 2023, 1:39 pm
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:00 am
by Dennis Crouch United Cannabis Corp (UCANN) vs. [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:56 am
Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:29 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) grants patents and registers trademarks, and the U.S. [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:02 pm
The has been a rise in fraudulent schemes targeting trademark applicants and owners, which is not surprising given the record number of applications being submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:15 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal issued a sua sponte Director Review decision on Tuesday explaining that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) reading of the inter partes review (IPR) statute was incorrect, and directing the Board to revisit a petition brought by Volvo Penta of the Americas, LLC and to analyze the Fintiv factors in view of a parallel district court proceeding. [read post]
4 May 2023, 4:15 am
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal issued a sua sponte Director Review decision on Tuesday explaining that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) reading of the inter partes review (IPR) statute was incorrect, and directing the Board to revisit a petition brought by Volvo Penta of the Americas, LLC and to analyze the Fintiv factors in view of a parallel district court proceeding. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of… [read post]
