Search for: "Torres v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2012, 12:19 pm
The court cited to the well-known New York case Citibank v Martin, 11 Misc3d 219 (Civ Court, New York County 2005) which sets forth the requirements of a prima facie case, and clearly states that an assignee's proof of standing is essential to its prima facie case. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:16 pm
So said the Court of Appeals in Torre v County of Nassau, 86 NY2d 421, wherein the court, noting the doctrine of legislative equivalency, held that a position created by a legislative act can be abolished only by a correlative legislative act. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm by John Elwood
Next up is yet another state-on-top habeas case, Howes v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am by John Elwood
  The Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 5:59 pm by JT
  The Court affirmed the denial of renewal and in a 3-2 decision stated: “Many of the efforts made by the plaintiffs and other individuals to [...] [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:15 am by Louis M. Solomon
Torre — German Discovery Rejected; Many Claims Dismissed Under Morrison (0) Rare FCPA Criminal Conviction Affirmed on Appeal (0) Ninth Circuit Refuses To Permit Case Involving Peppercorns and Trochus Buttons To Proceed Against the Sovereign State of Pohnpei (0) Morrison v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Supreme Court properly considered the evidence submitted on the motion, including the e-mails, which conclusively disposed of plaintiffs' claims (see Pitcock v Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman LLP, 74 AD3d 613 [2010]). [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Torre — German Discovery Rejected; Many Claims Dismissed Under Morrison (0) Ninth Circuit Refuses To Permit Case Involving Peppercorns and Trochus Buttons To Proceed Against the Sovereign State of Pohnpei (0) Morrison v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:43 am by Christopher G Sparks
Torres, 346 Ill.App.3d 214, 217 (4th Dist. 2004).State's attorneys will quickly point to Section 7-7 of the criminal code, which states that private citizens cannot use force to resist even an unlawful arrest. 720 ILCS 5/7-7. [read post]