Search for: "Tran v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 1,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2022, 11:07 am by Giles Peaker
Trans-people tend to feel anxious when out in the community due to concern about being victimised by wider society because they are a trans-person. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Thacker v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by David Super
  With more than two-thirds of the states gaining more power under a one-state-one-vote system, it is difficult to believe that the convention will agree to award states votes based on population. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:17 am by Fiona de Londras
Deciding healthcare priority on the basis of status rather than medical need More worrying to me, from a human rights perspective, is the insinuation within Cllr Keaveney’s intervention that allocating healthcare resources can be done on the basis of status; that this is a child v trans person analysis. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:59 am by Parker Higgins
Of course, that position stands in conflict with Marbury v. [read post]