Search for: "Turner v. Turner" Results 441 - 460 of 1,674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 6:13 am by Beth Graham
In Appling Farms & Appling Interests, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:36 am by Cyrus Farivar
(The second case was from the 3rd Circuit in July 2015, in a case known as US v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:31 am by The Law Office of John Guidry II
To see this simple grift in real life, let’s take a look at the recent case of Turner v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:44 am by Broc Romanek
The case is Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 11:40 am
In which case: See a doctor.Yeah, yeah, on the merits, the case involves a dispute between Justice Turner (who authors the majority opinion) and Justice Mosk (who dissents). [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 10:50 am
So sayeth the Court of Appeal (with Justice Mosk dissenting).Parenthetically, I smiled when I noticed that Justice Turner -- unlike both the trial court and Justice Mosk -- refused to use the (fairly common) term "whizzinator" to describe the device used by Haddad to try to cheat the test, calling it instead the sterile (and generic) term "alternate urine device. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 pm by John Floyd
  U.S. v Turner   In a June 22, 2017 decision, United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:39 pm
Robert Lee Turner (above left) was declared "an imminent hazard to public safety" and banned from operating any commercial motor vehicle in interstate commerce. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 6:05 pm by Gregory Forman
 That Action Transmittal discusses the procedural components required for enforcing child support obligations in compliance with the United States Supreme Court decision in Turner v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 5:48 am by Howard Friedman
  Judge Owen concluded that this does not create an Establishment Clause violation because in the prison context the more lenient Turner v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 6:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals holds these guidelines do not violate the First Amendment.The case is Reynolds v. [read post]