Search for: "U. S. v. King"
Results 441 - 460
of 543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
As the UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency warned advertisers, “By incorporating advertising from recognized brands the website administrator attempt[s] to make the site appear legitimate. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 6:49 am
King, 2018 WL 4868127 (N.J. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am
Now there’s a fourth, Bak v Rostek, 2020 NY Slip Op 33142(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 25, 2020], in which a 47.5% member of a single-asset realty-holding LLC sold his membership interest to the other 52.5% member for around $900,000 based on a $1.9 million valuation assigned by the buying member. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
U. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Cohen, 2012 NY Slip Op 50030(U) (Sup Ct Kings County Jan. 12, 2012), decided last week by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:30 pm
“Álvaro de Campos”, “Ricardo Reis”, “Alberto Caeiro” (+) Pessoa são vários (via) Se alguns escritores flertaram com outra persona, Fernando Pessoa dá um passo além. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:30 pm
“Álvaro de Campos”, “Ricardo Reis”, “Alberto Caeiro” (+) Pessoa são vários (via) Se alguns escritores flertaram com outra persona, Fernando Pessoa dá um passo além. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
Eva Blum-Dumontet has written a post for Privacy International’s website about government’s battles against encryption. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Karakus, 2011 NY Slip Op 51685(U) (Sup Ct Kings Co Sept. 15, 2011), pits shareholders Mustafa Boz and Ammer Muslu against a third shareholder, Selahattin Karakus. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm
They are also demanding the abolition of a lese majeste law which shields the kingdom’s ultra-powerful King Maha Vajiralongkorn and the royal family from defamation, and carries penalties of up to 15 years per charge. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 1:29 am
Canada On 12 November, the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta handed down judgement in RK v GSG, 2024 ABKB 661. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am
Republicans disapprove of Biden’s partial restoration of the pre-Trump status quo on policy grounds, but more importantly they think highlighting Biden’s actions will help them in 2024. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
A few months ago, we wrote about precisely such a case, Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County Sept. 4, 2018], in which Commercial Division Justice Lawrence S. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
King, Katherine. [read post]
