Search for: "U. S. v. Smalls"
Results 441 - 460
of 851
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2018, 12:45 pm
From today's Eleventh Circuit decision in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
In 1787, the constitutions of eight States—accounting for 70% of the U. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
Dismissal of the small claims action thus achieves "substantial justice" consistent with substantive law principles (CCA 1807; see Crosswell v Crosswell, 21 Misc 3d 131[A], 873 N.Y.S.2d 510, 2008 NY Slip Op 52051[U] [2008]). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 8:25 am
In the Supreme Court case of Wheat v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:02 am
More specifically, more than half of the executives surveyed expect a “U-shaped” economic recovery, which foresees a period of slower economic activity until 2021, while 38% of them expect a “V-shaped” recovery, which predicts a return to normal activity by the end of 2020. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:27 am
Conservation Commission of Falmouth, 19-223, involving a small (.37 of an acre) property that petitioner Janice Smyth’s parents bought in the 1970s at the southwestern end of Cape Cod. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:27 am
The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:32 pm
Gomez, 577 U. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:17 am
Whitman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 9:40 am
(See Higgins v Commissioner, 312 U. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Accordingly, the PTO’s absolute ban on the registration of marks such as TRUMP TOO SMALL is far more extensive than necessary to protect the right of publicity, which would not prevent the use of TRUMP TOO SMALL under any state’s right of p [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
The first intervening case was the Court's 2020 decision in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:07 pm
Alternatively, an employer may engage in its state’s short-time compensation program (also known as shared-work or work share programs), under which an employee can receive partial wages and partial regular unemployment benefits—thereby preserving the employee’s eligibility for the $600 FPUC benefit. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
” 512 U. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:25 pm
S. 159 (2001); and Rapanos v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:05 pm
Open micJanis Pilch, Rutgers U: domestically it seems obvious that litigation on 512 can’t change the systemic problem of infringement and the impossibility for most rightsholders to litigate. 512 sets up a permanent conflict b/t service providers and rightsholders. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Zekry v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:49 am
Pineapple Computer, at outset of Apple’s existence—[to me this is the Lollipops v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:03 pm
Jubelirer, 541 U. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
