Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 441 - 460 of 11,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm by FDABlog HPM
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s December 2009 “false marking” decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:47 am
  The so-called positive "endangerment finding," when issued in form of a final rule, would mark the agency's response to the U.S. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:19 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
The court, reversing the injunction and ruling against the trademark holder, found that the RISE label was a weak trademark because it strongly suggested the qualities of the product it labeled and there was extensive third-party usage of the same or similar marks (RiseandShine Corp. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:27 pm by Anna Gelpern
Mark makes an immensely important point in his post on the latest in NML v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:03 pm
§233(a), which makes the Federal Tort Claims Act the exclusive remedy for certain acts by U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 (1945) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 5:56 am
V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418, 434 (2003).Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: What do you think? [read post]