Search for: "U.S. v. York"
Results 441 - 460
of 16,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 9:32 pm
Solinsky v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:59 am
Further, in a recent New York case, Burgers Bar Five Towns, LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 1:16 pm
Satterthwaite (New York Univ. - Law) has posted The Story of El Masri v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:30 am
Annucci, 2017 U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:07 am
The event will run from 9am to 5pm, at the New York City Bar, 42 West 44th Street, New York, NY 10036. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 6:21 am
New York Telephone Co., supra; accord U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:45 am
The crux of the particular case, Windsor v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
In a lengthy opinion, a New York federal district court in Fortress Bible Church v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 10:43 am
In Nunez v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
In 2009, the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, issued an important decision in People v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:11 pm
, May 23, 2018Recently, in Johnson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:40 pm
” Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 8:40 am
Professor Sagers is a nationally renowned expert on antitrust law who has testified before the U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 11:20 pm
In Langkamp v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
New York City, 2013 U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:59 am
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:51 pm
New York is a big deal because all these contract reforms respond, at least in part, to U.S. court rulings, which (a) interpreted Argentina's pari passu clause as requiring ratable payment to holdout creditors, (b) said that CACs could cure the common cold, and (c) told market participants that they could avoid Argentina's fate by fixing their contracts. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
In Kane v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 1:09 pm
The ruling, Bostock v. [read post]
