Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HAND" Results 441 - 460 of 2,073
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
And luckily for America, there are no non-brazen routes by which the Republicans could keep Trump (and themselves) in power.To be sure, we all have seared in our memories the shamelessness of Bush v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
How do the bishops continue to wield sufficient political power to pack the United States Supreme Court while under the microscope for destroying so many children and families? [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:18 pm by Legal Aggregate
Goldfarb, 430 U.S. 199 (1977)—both cases she argued—provided the basis for her opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm by Amy Howe
Neither of her parents attended college: Her father, Nathan, came to the United States from Russia as a teenager and worked as a furrier; her mother, Celia Amster Bader, was born a few months after her parents arrived in the country from Austria and worked in a garment factory to put her brother through college. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:23 pm by Nathan Dorn
Hunter’s Lessee, and the United States v. the Amistad. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:34 am
  One gets hints of this possibility from the Declaration of the Indigenous Peoples Participating in the V Regional Forum On Business And Human Rights For Latin America An The Caribbean which was circulated during the course of the event. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:36 am by Russell Knight
For speech to be protected by the first amendment of the United States Constitution, it must be pure opinion and not heard as stating facts. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am by Paul Rosenzweig
It would effectively “go around” encryption by allowing the interdiction of malicious materials in an unencrypted state, even in the absence of predication for law enforcement intervention. [read post]