Search for: "UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 2,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On July 25, 2017, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an investigative report stating that US securities laws apply to sales of securities in the United States purchased with virtual currencies or distributed with blockchain technology. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:55 pm by Michael Rinne
United States, the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana similarly held that interests in a family limited liability company were not present interests. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by Roy Ginsburg
After the case was filed in 2001, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified the class in 2004. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 7:26 am by Dennis Crouch
United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021… [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 12:14 pm
In such cases income will likely be payable only to the extent there is money in reserve in the trust holding the United States government obligations. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On September 6, 2024, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) charged Esmark Inc. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:58 pm by Nathan Sheard
Our About Face campaign is a way for residents in communities throughout the United States to call for an end to government use of face surveillance. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
  Additionally, the United States has filed an amicus brief supporting petitioners that specifically casts doubt on the ability of the market to regulate fees. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:47 pm
The January 20 decision in Trusted Integration, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This generalization is true not just for companies in the United States but for all companies around the world. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm by Aurora Barnes
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm by David Post
I, § 9, cl. 8) provides that "no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them [the United States], shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:11 am by Odia Kagan
The rapid and continued growth of the program demonstrates Privacy Shield’s vital role in protecting personal data and contributing to the $7.1 trillion economic relationship between the United States and Europe. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State Street Bank and Trust Co., 5 NY3d 582, 591; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]