Search for: "US v. David May" Results 441 - 460 of 7,398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2017, 6:00 am by David Hansen, JD
This post was co-authored by David Hansen and Brandon Butler and cross posted on The Taper and on Duke University Libraries’ Scholarly Communications Blog. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am by David Hansen, JD
This post was co-authored by David Hansen and Brandon Butler and cross posted on The Taper and on Duke University Libraries’ Scholarly Communications Blog. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am by David Hansen, JD
This post was co-authored by David Hansen and Brandon Butler and cross posted on The Taper and on Duke University Libraries’ Scholarly Communications Blog. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 7:44 am by Silver Law Group
For a free, confidential consultation, email or call us today at (800) 975-4345. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 3:28 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Please be aware that acquiring and using pills may carry legal risk, especially for marginalized people. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 1:42 pm
        This argument relies on a number of empirical assertions which may or may not be true. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am by David Pocklington
Cite this article as: David Pocklington, "Contempt and use of documents in CDM proceedings" in Law & Religion UK, 11 April 2024, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2024/04/11/contempt-and-use-of-documents-in-cdm-proceedings/   [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Although the Second Circuit may have gotten to the right legal result (given the constraints under which lower courts operate), there is one aspect of its reasoning that I believe reflects a common and dangerous misunderstanding (an overreading, actually) of the highly contested Obamacare ruling, National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
That conclusion seems to be based on a mistaken application of the US Supreme Court opinion in Garcetti v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:23 pm by Robert Leonard
David Pagnani, IPR2013-00103 (PTAB May 23, 2013) the patent owner did not file a preliminary response. [read post]