Search for: "US v. David May"
Results 441 - 460
of 7,398
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
This post was co-authored by David Hansen and Brandon Butler and cross posted on The Taper and on Duke University Libraries’ Scholarly Communications Blog. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
This post was co-authored by David Hansen and Brandon Butler and cross posted on The Taper and on Duke University Libraries’ Scholarly Communications Blog. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:00 am
This post was co-authored by David Hansen and Brandon Butler and cross posted on The Taper and on Duke University Libraries’ Scholarly Communications Blog. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 7:44 am
For a free, confidential consultation, email or call us today at (800) 975-4345. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 3:28 pm
Please be aware that acquiring and using pills may carry legal risk, especially for marginalized people. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:31 am
T.A.B. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:57 pm
Locke v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
” But at other times it may not. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:21 pm
P215 leave may only be granted on a question of jurisdiction or of law. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:25 pm
In W.J.A. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:29 pm
In W.J.A. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 1:42 pm
This argument relies on a number of empirical assertions which may or may not be true. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:19 am
Cite this article as: David Pocklington, "Contempt and use of documents in CDM proceedings" in Law & Religion UK, 11 April 2024, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2024/04/11/contempt-and-use-of-documents-in-cdm-proceedings/ [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Although the Second Circuit may have gotten to the right legal result (given the constraints under which lower courts operate), there is one aspect of its reasoning that I believe reflects a common and dangerous misunderstanding (an overreading, actually) of the highly contested Obamacare ruling, National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 10:47 am
Dangler, Judge David G. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
That conclusion seems to be based on a mistaken application of the US Supreme Court opinion in Garcetti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:01 am
Rascal House, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:23 pm
David Pagnani, IPR2013-00103 (PTAB May 23, 2013) the patent owner did not file a preliminary response. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
David Cole: Thanks so much, Jameel. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:08 am
David Allen with RCI was up next. [read post]