Search for: "US v. Potter"
Results 441 - 460
of 642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2010, 10:31 am
The suit, Mesa Water, L.P. and G&J Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 4:37 am
Williams v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
The third's a little hard to research, so we'll use a proxy for the allowing of negligence concerns in strict liability, which is whether a plaintiff’s comparative fault/negligence reduces the verdict or at some level becomes a complete defense.Here's what we've found:AlabamaAlabama follows its own peculiar form of strict liability called the “Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:52 am
McDonald Technology in Litigation: Friend or Foe by Simon V. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:36 pm
" Loewen was just a travesty," says Potter. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:58 am
Potter; affirming Judge Toepfer's dismissal of DUI prosecution on constitutional speedy trial groundsState v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Radiodetection – ITC institutes investigation (337-TA-727) regarding certain underground cable and pipe locators (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright Bill H.R. 5704 would curb access to Government works (Public Knowledge) Copyright termination: How authors can reclaim their copyrights (IP Osgoode) US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals guts ‘first sale’: Costco… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:38 pm
In Visa International Service Association v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 8:39 am
I just read Anders v California for the first time (ever, or in a long time) in preparation for writing this post. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:39 am
In State v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Harlan II and Potter Stewart (appointed by Eisenhower), Lewis F. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:00 am
§ 13.3 Intervening and Superseding Causes The Case: Potter v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:46 pm
One test used by courts to assess fee reasonableness or the lack thereof, is that which, ‘shocks the conscience of the court.‘ But in practice, the ‘shock the conscience‘ test seems too ethereal, too ambiguous, as helpful as Justice Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity, “But I know it when I see it.” [1] Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm
Prototype of latter used old bike and other materials to hand. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am
Hardwick in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:23 am
In Fatal Justice from 1995, for example, Jerry Allen Potter and Fred Bost tell a different story. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:59 am
In Celanese Canada Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm
The third installment dealt with proposals to steer citizens toward “hard news” and get them to financially support it through the use of “news vouchers” or “public interest vouchers. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm
The doctrine has been approved by the High Court of Australia: Potter v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1906) 3 CLR 479; [1906] HCA 88; Attorney-General (United Kingdom) v Heinemann Publishers Australia Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 30; [1988] HCA 25. [read post]
