Search for: "US v. Smith"
Results 441 - 460
of 9,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2023, 9:04 am
The transition from first-to-invent to first-to-file has involved a number of quirks, the latest is found in SNIPR Technologies Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Biden v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:28 pm
The Georgia Supreme Court, in Nunn v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
Evidentiary hurdles faced by the Select Committee have been overcome by Special Counsel Smith through the use of his more robust subpoena power and a series of court victories. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
Samia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:05 pm
Cynthia Godsoe (Brooklyn Law School), Abbe Smith (Georgetown University Law Center), & Ellen Yaroshefsky (Hofstra University - Maurice A. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
This episode is a follow-up podcast to Episode 9, Epic v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
Channel 5 agreed to pay substantial damages to the claimants for publishing conversations obtained using covert microphones and body cameras by High Court Enforcement Officers. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
" Morever, Justice Gorsuch continued in his majority opinion: "Before us, no party challenges these conclusions. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am
Let’s face it, Doe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In contrast to Smith’s approach, judge-shopping from the start in Missouri v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am
Doe precedents or Doe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
Supreme Court ruled that the race-conscious admissions programs used by Harvard College and University of North Carolina (UNC) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, effectively striking down the use of affirmative action programs for college and university admissions across the country (Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:32 am
Nev. 2022); see also Smith v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
"[J]udicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited" (Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]). [read post]
