Search for: "US v. Spencer"
Results 441 - 460
of 780
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
I'm learning more and more about the details of Hawaii criminal law.Before this opinion, I wouldn't have thought that a conviction in Hawaii for "criminal property damage in the first degree" was anything near as dangerous as "burglary of a dwelling, arson or extortion" or a crime that "involves the use of explosives." [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 6:44 am
LEXIS 105165 (ED WA, July 25, 2013), a Washington federal district court dismissed a Muslim inmate's complaint that prayer oil he ordered was rejected because the vendor he used was no longer an authorized vendor.In Toland v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 3:37 pm
See, e.g., Spencer, J., Arbitration, Class Waivers, and Statutory Rights, 35 HARV. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:42 am
In the famous case R.A.V. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 11:52 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:59 am
In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:26 pm
It's now November 9, and you advise us at 7:27 a.m. that you can't make it. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:33 am
Zee Entertainment objected to Zeebox's choice of name and logo for its app for mobile devices, including its use of "Zee" and "Zee TV". [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:43 am
At the end of last month, the long-awaited judgment in the Interflora v Marks and Spencer case on trade mark infringement as it relates to keyword advertising was delivered by Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
29 May 2013, 10:51 pm
Despite ACA’ amendments to HIPAA’s bona fide wellness program rules and the 11th Circuit’s rejection of an EEOC challenge in Broward County v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:45 am
The IPKat does some fieldresearch into flowers ...Connoisseurs of long judgments will know that Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer Plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch) was decided last Monday, 21 May 2013, in the Chancery Division, High Court of Justice, England and Wales, by (who else?) [read post]
26 May 2013, 1:33 pm
Noting that “[v]arious situations have come to the attention of the Departments where a health insurance policy is advertised as fixed indemnity coverage” that do not “Meet the conditions for excepted benefits,” FAQ XI warns, “The Departments plan to work with the States to ensure that health insurance issuers comply with relevant requirements for different types of insurance policies and provide consumers the protections of the Affordable Care… [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am
Administration and management of the programme will be developed by the SC in consultation with the 'High-Level Tripartite Committee' established to implement and oversee the National Action Plan on Fire Safety, as well as with the Ministry of Labour and Employment of Bangladesh (MoLE), the ILO and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH (GIZ), to maximize synergy at operational level; and the SC may make use of the offices of… [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:31 am
The Third Circuit’s decision in Glaxo is distinguishable from the Ninth Circuit’s position on a similar issue in Parra v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:22 am
By Nicole KilloranOCS/Pappas v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 11:16 am
Interestingly, the Volokh Conspiracy notes that the New York Supreme Court held today in Bezio v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:27 am
As such, AETN was not entitled to restrict its use. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:20 pm
Spencer (prisoner rights, Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act)* State Courts Bulletin Cases featured:In re Morris (Indian Child Welfare Act, notice) In re D.L and K.L. [read post]
