Search for: "US v. Strange" Results 441 - 460 of 2,607
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2010, 2:31 pm
The OHIM’s approach has been supported in BMI Bertollo Srl v OHIM, in which a national application in Italy which listed the headings of several classes was deemed to cover all goods and services which compromised those classes.5. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 11:17 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, there is one case before the CCB that stands out to me, Benjamin Bronner v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
But we are unable to place much weight on it, since it does not address any of the reasoning which … leads us to conclude that “damage” in article 23 includes non-pecuniary loss including distress. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Milner counterclaimed for revocation of some of NGRS's trade mark registrations for non-use (this counterclaim succeeded in part) and he also asserted that two of the NGRS’s trade marks were applied for in bad faith because that body intended to use them as collective marks and had no bona fide intention to use them as ordinary trade marks. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
” By this standard, however, a spouse’s consortium claim seems strange. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:05 am by Orin Kerr
Maynard‘s mosaic theory is novel, strange, and yet also strikingly vague. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 5:04 am
Last week, the Third Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Castleberry v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:12 pm by Steve McConnell
For example, the FDA asked for comments in the wake of the Thompson v. [read post]