Search for: "United Energy Corp. v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
An empirical study of climate change litigation in the United States. 40 Envtl. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
United States Can Co., 131 F. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am
– IPO consultation (Class 99) Reform of IP taxation – consultation underway (IP finance) The PCC Page no.8: Last chance to make your voice heard – consultation on the proposed limit on recoverable damages in the Patents County Court (PatLit) United States US General USPTO launches Twitter account (Patent Docs) US Patent Reform ‘Patent reform’ still possible in 2010?!? [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 1:28 am
Judge Armstrong cited Triton Energy Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
(Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
Cancer Research sued Barr for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on July 20, 2007. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm
C&J Energy Services, Inc. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Bunn-O-Matic Corp. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
To the surprise of all parties, and, no doubt, the glee of defendants, one of which is the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) (both a government agency and a private corporation), the United States Solicitor General joined with defendants in petitioning the United States Supreme Court for review of the Second Circuit’s decision in AEP v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 5:17 pm
” United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:32 am
In the article, I explain that: In United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:15 am
Oil Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:44 am
Federal-Mogul Corp (Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Plaintiff’s choice of forum for false marking claims given little weight where Plaintiff was formed specifically to pursue litigation: Unique Product Solutions, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
Haldex Brake Products Corp (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct pleading must allege how examiner would have used undisclosed information: SynQor, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:33 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Ex-Executive Indicted for Trade Secret Theft In Computer Source Code's Misappropriation United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
