Search for: "United States Company Corporation"
Results 441 - 460
of 18,382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2020, 8:38 am
On January 18, 2019, the United States Internal Revenue Service issued final regulations meant to address the confusion regarding whether a rental business is a “trade or business” under Internal Revenue Code Section 199A. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:30 am
With the Dow Jones Average still hovering around record highs, the reported decline in the number of fraud suits, and continued evidence of the premium obtained by foreign companies cross listing in the United States, the often intemperate criticism of SOX began to recede. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 1:20 pm
A rule that tied paying taxes, or repatriation of foreign profits to the United States, to obtaining a patent would almost certainly create an extraordinary disincentive to seek a patent in the United States, which itself would lead to a nearly unimaginable parade of horribles at a time that the U.S. economy is nearly wholly reliant on innovation and technology. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 7:20 pm
From Wikipedia: The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (or PCAOB) (sometimes called "Peekaboo") is a private-sector, non-profit corporation created by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a 2002 United States federal law, to oversee the auditors of public companies. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 7:43 pm
But the company had no plans to repatriate those funds in the United States, at which time they would be subject to taxation. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:36 am
“In this case the government charged the defendants with the wrong crimes,” begins the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:28 pm
Generally, both state and federal law enforcement have three primary tools to facilitate corporate investigations. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:58 am
Both companies allowed P2P file sharing software, which the FTC in 2010 had warned posed significant data security risks, to be installed on corporate computer systems.? [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 8:02 am
As far back as the late 1800s, medical professionals understood that asbestos posed a danger to human health, and by the 1920s, life insurance companies in the United States and Canada had stopped selling policies to workers in asbestos-intensive fields. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 7:36 am
I believe in the Constitution of the United States and the Seventh Amendment. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
And so, in place of the other topics that hovered in the air at our home, I told my parents what I was learning about the evolution of corporate governance in the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
Here are the opening paragraphs: The United States spent three and a half trillion dollars on healthcare in 2017 alone. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted First American Financial Corporation's Writ of Certiorari it filed in the Denise P. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:17 am
While the ICGN’s purview is a global one, we believe this matter is particularly relevant in the United States given last year’s Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 8:57 am
This process keeps Delaware’s statutes on the cutting edge of LLC and corporate law in the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 2:48 pm
The keys to navigating these new reporting requirements are:Whether an entity is a Reporting Company that must report to FinCEN (or whether that entity falls into one of the exceptions to the reporting requirements).Who are the Beneficial Owners and Company Applicants whose information must be reported.When reports are due to FinCEN.Key CTA TermsReporting Company includes virtually any entity formed in the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:53 am
Kathy Fogel of Shareholder-Authorized Corporate Political Spending in the United Kingdom. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
We are discussing Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:14 pm
company. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 10:30 am
While some of the factors split down the middle—the plaintiffs are American and the defendant is Japanese; the accident occurred in Japan but the alleged injuries were felt in the United States—TEPCO argued that the policy interests of both the United States and Japan strongly favor exclusive jurisdiction for the state in which the accident occurred (Japan, in this case). [read post]
