Search for: "United States ex rel. v. Exelis, Inc."
Results 441 - 460
of 960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2022, 12:21 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
16 May 2010, 11:17 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
See United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 4:06 pm
See Apple Computer v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 7:09 am
District Judge Joseph Anderson bucked this trend in United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 12:47 pm
Solvay Pharms, Inc., 588 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2009) and United States, ex rel. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:52 pm
” If this sounds familiar, it is because the legal argument advanced by the Independence Institute is parallel to the reasoning adopted by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in its opinion ending the John Doe Investigation (State ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 10:09 am
District Court, Central District of California, United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:06 am
Carlson, 817 F.3d 867, 877 (4th Cir. 2016); Reed Elsevier, Inc. ex rel. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 11:12 am
In addition to the state and federal courts of D.C., VA, and M.D., he is a member of the Federal Courts in Puerto Rico, Colorado, and Texas, as well as the Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit, where he has recently argued and won three appellate matters, the Veteran’s Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court, where he was lead counsel on a False Claims Act case (See United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 8:24 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
State ex rel. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 5:09 pm
”) This would seem to overturn United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:36 am
United States ex rel Escobar, No. 15-7, is a civil suit under the False Claims Act, but it deals with the meaning of "fraud," which is also a crime. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:41 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:08 am
Graham County Soil and Water Conservation Dist v. ex rel. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:28 am
Moreover, "significant possibility" is a relatively new phrase that the United States Supreme Court used in Hill - but in a different context; by [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 8:10 pm
The NPRM basically follows the en banc decision in Aqua Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:00 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 May 2012, 8:56 am
Goldberg, No. 10-3785 at 3, referring to United States ex rel. [read post]