Search for: "United States of America et al"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,400
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2017, 5:10 am
Barboan, et al. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm
Barboan, et al. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm
Barboan, et al. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:23 am
Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, et al. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
Such remedies should include judicial and non-judicial remedies compatible with the Third Pillar duties and responsibilities of States under the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
The CDA also expressly states that “Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property” and that “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 7:45 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Ted Stewart, Supreme Power: 7 pivotal Supreme Court decisions that had a major impact on America (2017). [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 5:04 am
On June 1st, 2017, the United States District Court (USDC) at Washington D.C. granted summary judgement in the case of Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 7:14 am
The United States is an open economy, closely integrated with world capital markets. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in… [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
MADDEN136 S.Ct. 2505 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.June 27, 2016.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.136 S.Ct. 1484 (2016)MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, et al., petitioners,v.Saliha MADDEN.No. 15-610.Supreme Court of United States.March 21, 2016.The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in… [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Amr al-Azm, associate professor at Shawnee State University, drew attention to the importance of Syrian cultural heritage and the importance of non-state actors to preserve it. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
During two days of nonclassified argumentation, the defendants in U.S. v Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. argued that the government has delayed, denied, and/or destroyed discovery documents. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 10:38 am
The Court ruled in Adam Steele, et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
Seijas, Manuel de Sá Vianna, Jesús María Yepes, et al.)- Latin American particularities in international law (uti possidetis, compulsory arbitration for the settlement of State to State disputes, norms limiting the right of foreign interventions, et al.)- Etc.5. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm
Backstrom On October 13, 2017, Petitioners League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), et al. filed a motion to expedite briefing and hearing in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 11:32 pm
Seijas, Manuel de Sá Vianna, Jesús María Yepes, et al.)- Latin American particularities in international law (uti possidetis, compulsory arbitration for the settlement of State to State disputes, norms limiting the right of foreign interventions, et al.)- Etc.5. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 8:35 am
Here are the briefs(PDF) in the matter of Standing Rock Sioux Tribe et al v. [read post]
